CA RE Salesperson · Cheat Sheet
| Approach | Best Used For | Core Formula | Primary Data Source |
| Sales Comparison (Market) | Residential, vacant land, condos | Adjusted comparable sale prices | MLS sold comps |
| Cost | New construction, special-use, unique properties | Land Value + Depreciated Cost of Improvements | Cost manuals, land sales |
| Income | Apartments, commercial, investment property | Value = NOI ÷ Cap Rate | Rent rolls, market cap rates |
| Situation | Adjustment to Comp Price | ||
| Comp has a feature subject LACKS (comp is better) | Subtract from comp price | ||
| Comp LACKS a feature subject has (subject is better) | Add to comp price | ||
| Features are equal | No adjustment | ||
| Concept | Definition | CA Note | |
| Market Value | Most probable price; arm's-length; informed, motivated parties; reasonable exposure time | Foundation of all appraisals | |
| Market Price | Actual transaction price — may differ from market value | Distressed sales and bidding wars cause divergence | |
| Assessed Value | Prop 13 base year value; max 2%/year increase; resets at sale | Typically far below market value in appreciating CA markets | |
| Appraised Value | Licensed appraiser's formal USPAP opinion | Required for mortgage lending | |
| Listing Price | Seller's asking price | Often set below market in competitive CA markets to drive multiple offers | |
| Loan Value | Lower of appraised value or purchase price, used for LTV | LTV = Loan Amount ÷ Value | |
| Principle | One-Line Rule | ||
| Supply & Demand | Value rises when demand exceeds supply; falls when supply exceeds demand | ||
| Substitution | Buyer won't pay more than cost of equally desirable alternative — foundation of sales comparison | ||
| Contribution | Feature's value = what it adds to total value, NOT what it cost to install | ||
| Conformity | Value maximized when property matches neighborhood standards | ||
| Highest & Best Use | Legally permissible + physically possible + financially feasible + maximally productive | ||
| Progression | Lower-value property pulled upward by higher-value neighborhood | ||
| Regression | Higher-value property pulled downward by lower-value neighborhood | ||
| Anticipation | Value reflects expected future benefits (income, appreciation) | ||
| Change | Markets shift; appraisers apply time adjustments to dated comps | ||
| Plottage | Combining adjacent parcels creates value greater than sum of individual parts | ||
| Type | Cause | Curable? | CA Example |
| Physical — Curable | Wear/deferred maintenance; fix cost < value added | Yes | Worn carpet, peeling paint, broken fixtures |
| Physical — Incurable | Structural deterioration; fix cost > value added | No | Foundation settling, major seismic damage, severe wood rot |
| Functional — Curable | Outdated feature or deficiency; fix cost < value added | Yes | Adding a 2nd bathroom; upgrading original 1960s kitchen |
| Functional — Incurable | Poor design or superadequacy; cannot be economically fixed | No | Bedrooms accessible only through other rooms; bowling alley in tract home |
| Economic / External | Forces entirely outside the property | Never | Freeway noise, industrial neighbor, LAX flight path, declining economy |
| CMA | Formal Appraisal | AVM (Zillow, etc.) | |
| Prepared by | Licensed agent/broker | Licensed/certified appraiser | Algorithm |
| USPAP required | No | Yes | No |
| Site inspection | Usually | Always | Never |
| Used for mortgage lending | No | Yes | No |
| Used for estate/court | No | Yes | No |
| Cost | Free (part of service) | $400–$800+ | Free |
| Market | Typical Multifamily Cap Rate | ||
| San Francisco / Bay Area | 3.5–5% | ||
| Los Angeles | 4–5.5% | ||
| Sacramento / Inland Empire | 5–6.5% |
Aligned to the California DRE salesperson exam content outline.
Personalize this sheet — focus it however you study, or build one from the exact questions you keep getting wrong.